Watch CSI: Cyber Online Free. CSI: Cyber Episodes at mangopoker88.org

Everyone else says Awful. I agree. Here's the worst part.

1 /10

Gotta love how they bought themselves 30 minutes by agreeing to re-open the auction site in the middle of the day in Baltimore, then set up with a SW ...

See Full Comment

I can't get past the flashy graphics

2 /10

We have really enjoyed some of the CSI series. We still watch the Las Vegas episodes and look forward to them each week (when we can guess what night ...

See Full Comment

We have really enjoyed some of the CSI series. We still watch the Las Vegas episodes and look forward to them each week (when we can guess what night they are on). We also really enjoyed CSI NY and were sad when that series ended. CSI Miami was great, except we just couldn't deal with the mannerisms of David Caruso's character so we didn't watch it. Caruso was great in the first season of NYPD Blue. It looks like CSI Cyber might be another one we will take a pass on.Seven minutes into the show when the first commercial hit I didn't like CSI Cyber. The basic concept is fine. I didn't get to know the characters but that could come with time. We know that most shows don't settle down into their stride for a few episodes, or for some even half a season. But it is the music and flashy graphic jumps that first turned us off. Frankly it was difficult to judge the acting quality because the episode was so chopped up none of them were on screen long enough. But what I could discern was mostly poor acting. I blame that on the director rather than the actors.CSI Cyber isn't a serious crime scene investigation series. It's more like the fast action glitzy type of show. MY feeling is CBS gave it the CSI name to give it a boost but it is more likely to tarnish the name. The pace seems more like the recent Scorpion show which we are still giving a chance. I'm not sure we'll give CSI Cyber a chance.If you like fast paced shows with lots of action and don't mind questionable crime investigation methods you may like this show. It makes wide use of hand held cameras, nothing is stationary, camera angles last about 4 to 5 seconds and even then the camera is moving. It's like the director gave instructions to the editing crew that if the camera view didn't change in 5 seconds or less they'd be fired. If you're not already schizophrenic you may be after watching this show. Overall I blame the director for this mess. but I'm sure the style is already burned into the series. They are shooting for a much different audience than those who enjoy CSI Las Vegas.

CSI - scary, relevant and GREAT entertainment - loved the show.

10 /10

I disagree with the first reviewers criticism of Patricia completely. Has that reviewer every met a cyber professional? Patricia plays the part PERFE ...

See Full Comment

Brilliant I say

-/10

Excellent indeed. The franchise is super chess.People like Boris Spasky would enjoy this show.And now the place we can't escape from, in the world we ...

See Full Comment

Everyone else says Awful. I agree. Here's the worst part.

10 /10

Gotta love how they bought themselves 30 minutes by agreeing to re-open the auction site in the middle of the day in Baltimore, then set up with a SW ...

See Full Comment

Not Impressed

-/10

I was very excited to watch the show, but after having had the chance to watch the first episode I can say that I am not impressed. I felt as though ...

See Full Comment

Painfully bad... CSI: Hackers (1995)

2 /10

Um... why would an online auction have voices? Seriously though... this show is bad, really bad. Not since Hackers (1995) has tech been gotten so wro ...

See Full Comment

The first episode is soooooooooo bad

2 /10

There are people in this that I am glad to see on TV. I was a fan of Medium and Rosanna Arquette was a firecracker before that show, but there is a t ...

See Full Comment

There are people in this that I am glad to see on TV. I was a fan of Medium and Rosanna Arquette was a firecracker before that show, but there is a through-line with her from firecracker, through mom rolls to this. James Van Der Beek has been impressive since he played a crazy version of himself on Don't Trust The B In 23. He was also good in Friends With Better lives and the lame Power/Ranger Bootleg. CSI Cybers shows a hint of the Beek being able to pull off action and when he is done with this show I would love to see him in action rolls as a detective or fighting aliens or something. And it is great to see Peter MacNicol back on TV too. He was great on Numb3rs, Ally McBeal and Ghost Busters 2. I am going to blame the writers, producers, editors and directors because no one is giving a good performance in this episode. First, their opening case is a baby abduction. What kind of amber alert sentimental bull-crap story is that? It is like the annual obligatory kid episode on NCIS only worse. Arquette is unconvincing in her stating that her unit is taking this case. It is a flimsy set-up and she was not able to connect with it. Then at the crime scene, hacker #1 squabbles with hacker #2 over who has the most cooties or something equally lame. Arquette never is convincing as any type of cop in this, she only ever comes across as a mom. And the Beek is also given nothing to work with and comes across as hollow. ***Possible Spoilers*** There is a scene where the Beek jumps in water (in slow motion) and it feels almost John Woo or something, but they don't cut soon enough and it ends with a almost splashing-in-a-wading-pool bit. ***Possible Spoilers*** There are some people who get shot in this episode and they are unconvincing as dying people. That could be editing. Maybe don't let the second victim ask a stupid question about the first victim before he dies.The episode is chock full of really bad decisions from the creators. The episode never gets anywhere near immersive because every minute or so something happens that pulls the viewer out of the story. My hope is that this show gets cancelled so the original CSI can get another season. I never liked the show under Peterson, but it has been great since Ted Danson took over. I give this 2 stars instead of 1 because Peter MacNicol was flawless with his five or less lines, and The Beek did eek out some charm no matter how badly the creators tried to kill it.

I can't get past the flashy graphics

2 /10

We have really enjoyed some of the CSI series. We still watch the Las Vegas episodes and look forward to them each week (when we can guess what night ...

See Full Comment

Horrible...

10 /10

I was really looking forward to the show C.S.I Cyber but it was nothing but a let down. James Van Der Beek will always be the Dawson's Creek kid. Com ...

See Full Comment

Terribly flawed, mindless and untalented junk.

10 /10

I'm actually at a loss on where to begin with the terrible first episode I watched last night. At first I thought I'd just give it a chance, being th ...

See Full Comment

Worst depictions of technology since Hackers (1995)

10 /10

Writing, acting, everything mediocre, just another crime show with generic characters, the hardcore geek, etc.However, every single depiction of tech ...

See Full Comment

Not good

4 /10

So far...episode 1 = not good, not good at all - bad acting all round, even from Patricia Arquette which really surprised me, below par script/plot, ...

See Full Comment

Includes Spoiler

DoctorWhen

Poor acting, bad directing, horrid writting, including uncanny tech, intense staring, villanious villains, cliches, non-sensical plot development general over-the-top-ness and Lincoln. Feels like the unwanted child of Criminal Minds and CSI Miami

SeriesFreeak

Loved this :/ 2 bad that it got cancelled :/ #BringCSI:CyberBack!

xEmily

I'm so fed up with good series Always getting cancelled after one or two seasons

PKay

9 /10

This CSI is just different! It got me captivated me

whocares

it is amazing

kaumali

Love this show. I always learn new things about the cyber world.

chamac15

This is fantastic ,an eye opener in the cyber worl